2022考研英语 中公2022考研英语同源阅读精讲80篇 下载 mobi 免费 pdf 百度网盘 epub 2025 在线 电子书

《中公版·2022考研英语：同源阅读精讲80篇》共包含包含三部分内容：阅读的基础知识（导学）、20个单元同源阅读练习（80篇）及测试题（20篇）。其中，阅读的基础知识包括读懂长难句的方法和考研英语阅读题型分类及做题技巧。

阅读练习的解析部分包含文章导读和段落及试题精析两大模块。其中段落及试题精析模块包含参考译文、逻辑梳理、背景知识、核心词汇及短语、长难句剖析和试题精析版块，不仅帮助考生掌握单词、短语、长难句等英语基础知识，提升翻译能力，而且还能锻炼考生分析文章和解答题目的逻辑思维能力，增加国外经济、文化、教育、历史等背景知识的储备，从而提升考生阅读理解答题能力。

题本

Unit1

Text1(ShelterinPlace)2

Text2(HowtoMakeArtificialIntelligenceMoreDemocratic)4

Text3(TheGuardianViewontheAgeofCriminalResponsibility:RaiseItNow)6

Text4(PoliticiansCan’tBeAbovetheLaw.Facebook’sRulesAreAnotherStory)8

单元测试题10

答案速览14

Unit2

Text1(ChildPovertyIsaMoralTragedy.ThisPolicyWouldSignificantlyReducetheNumberofKidsAffected)16

Text2(HowtoBeatOnlineCourseDropout)18

Text3(TheGuardianViewonSurveillance:BigBrotherIsNottheOnlyWatcherNow)20

Text4(RaisingWagesIsJustaStartonFixingSkilledWorkerVisas)22

单元测试题24

答案速览28

Unit3

Text1(TheGuardianViewontheHumanities:theImportanceofBeingRounded)30

Text2(AirlinesBlameCovid-19forRowingBackClimateCommitments)32

Text3(HowGreenIsYourSoftware)34

Text4(AlgorithmsAreMakingEconomicInequalityWorse)36

单元测试题38

答案速览42

Unit4

Text1(WhoBenefitsFromPublicGreenSpace)44

Text2(HowtoDe-corruptCollegeAdmissions)46

Text3(GenerousUnemploymentBenefitsAreNotKeepingAmericansFromWork)48

Text4(PerhapstheFDACouldHaveWaitedonVaping,ButItWasRighttoAct)50

单元测试题52

答案速览56

Unit5

Text1(TheGuardianViewonLiterature:WeNeedtheNobelPrize)58

Text2(Facial-RecognitionTechnologyNeedsMoreRegulation)60

Text3(AsCarsDitchFossilFuels,HowCanGovernmentsTaxMotorists)62

Text4(TheMoonReallyMayHaveStrangeEffectsonOurHealth)64

单元测试题66

答案速览70

Unit6

Text1(UberRidesCostMoreOK)72

Text2(WhenRankLeadstoRancour)74

Text3(PessimismVS.Progress)76

Text4(CommunicationIsKeytoConstructivePeerReview)78

单元测试题80

答案速览84

Unit7

Text1(TheGuardianViewonEngland’sHungryChildren:TheIndigestibleTruth)86

Text2(FacebookShouldn’tHavetoPayPublishersforNews)88

Text3(VoteandBeHanged)90

Text4(WhyLondonHousePricesJumpedinNovember)92

单元测试题94

答案速览98

Unit8

Text1(DNAIsNotaBlueprint)100

Text2(IfItInnovates,TaxIt,AlexandriaOcasio-CortezSuggests)102

Text3(ACaliforniaBillHasNationwideRamificationsfortheGigEconomy)104

Text4(TheGuardianViewonShrinkingBreaks:TheRighttoRelax)106

单元测试题108

答案速览112

Unit9

Text1(Colleges,Don’tDitchtheSAT)114

Text2(DigitalPayments—RichCountriesMustStartPlanningforaCashlessFuture)116

Text3(DigitalInjustice:WhenComputersMakeThingsWorse)118

Text4(ThePromotionCurse)120

单元测试题122

答案速览126

Unit10

Text1(PritiPatel’sImmigrationChangesWillPushtheCareCrisisovertheEdge)128

Text2(Self-destructingeBooksRevealaDarkDigitalTruth)130

Text3(DriverlessCarsAreStuckinaJam)132

Text4(GenerationRentGrowsUp)134

单元测试题136

答案速览140

Unit11

Text1(ASAPIsMoreImportantThanAffirmativeAction)142

Text2(American’sUnemploymentSystemDoesNotDoItsJob)144

Text3(Europe’s“RighttoBeForgotten”ShowsLegislatorsWhatNottoDo)146

Text4(TheGuardianViewonSpecialEducationalNeeds:CouncilsNeedMoreMoney)148

单元测试题150

答案速览154

Unit12

Text1(Covid-19StrengthenstheCaseforDigitalIDCards)156

Text2(AdvertisingMayMakePeopleMiserable,ButItStillHasItsUses)158

Text3(FreshThinkingNeededtoKeepBigTechinCheck)160

Text4(Education—Teachers,Tested)162

单元测试题164

答案速览168

Unit13

Text1(DoesBilingualismMakeYouSmarter)170

Text2(“PersuasiveTechnologies”PromptChildHealthFears)172

Text3(WagingWaronRecessions)174

Text4(TheGuardianViewonNurses:RestoringGrantsIsNotEnough)176

单元测试题178

答案速览182

Unit14

Text1(TheGuardianViewonPlayStreets:WhereAsphaltMeetsGrassroots)184

Text2(SpeedingUpScienceDuringthePandemic)186

Text3(GettingBackonTrack—HowRisingRailFaresandFallingPunctualityUndermineConfidence)188

Text4(TheGuardianViewon“FlightShame”:FaceIt—LifeMustChange)190

单元测试题192

答案速览196

Unit15

Text1(TheGuardianViewonA-levels:EndtheGuessworkinUniversityAdmissions)198

Text2(TaxingE-cigarettesLikeJuulIsaGoodWaytoStopTeen-vaping)200

Text3(TheExxonValdezofCyberspace)202

Text4(TheNecessityofDiversityintheDigitalNewsroom)204

单元测试题206

答案速览210

Unit16

Text1(TheRowOverTaxingBigTechFirmsHeatsUp)212

Text2(APlanforManagingConstantInterruptionsatWork)214

Text3(CanPrizesHelpWomenShatterScience’sGlassCeiling)216

Text4(TheGuardianViewonaWealthTax:NecessaryButNotSufficient)218

单元测试题220

答案速览224

Unit17

Text1(FreeBooksOnlineWhoCouldBeAgainstThat)226

Text2(AdultChildrenAreStrainingtheGenerosityofParents)228

Text3(AIIsn’taSolutiontoAllOurProblems)230

Text4(PayGuaranteed,PerformanceOptional)232

单元测试题234

答案速览238

Unit18

Text1(OnlineAdvertisingExploitsHumanity’sMalleableTastes)240

Text2(ForMostTaxpayers,FilingShouldBeFreeandEasy)242

Text3(BigTechMayBeLosingItsAllureforTalentedStaff)244

Text4(ANewKindofOnlineSchoolWantstoTeachNursing,andMore)246

单元测试题248

答案速览252

Unit19

Text1(JapanNudgesItsDoorOpen)254

Text2(GoogletoCiteRivalsandPrivacyinU.S.LawsuitDefense)256

Text3(TheGuardianViewonaBookGlut:TotheVictorGotheSpoils)258

Text4(AnotherMisguided“War”onObesity)260

单元测试题262

答案速览266

Unit20

Text1(HowtoMakeDeadlinesMotivating,NotStressful)268

Text2(WhyConstraintsAreGoodforInnovation)270

Text3(HowAncientRitualsHelpUsAdapttotheDigitalAge)272

Text4(CanEducationSolveEverything)274

单元测试题276

答案速览280

解析

Unit1

文章与试题精析2

Text1(ShelterinPlace)2

Text2(HowtoMakeArtificialIntelligenceMoreDemocratic)12

Text3(TheGuardianViewontheAgeofCriminalResponsibility:RaiseItNow)20

Text4(PoliticiansCan’tBeAbovetheLaw.Facebook’sRulesAreAnotherStory)28

单元测试题详解37

Unit2

文章与试题精析40

Text1(ChildPovertyIsaMoralTragedy.ThisPolicyWouldSignificantlyReducetheNumberofKidsAffected)40

Text2(HowtoBeatOnlineCourseDropout)49

Text3(TheGuardianViewonSurveillance:BigBrotherIsNottheOnlyWatcherNow)57

Text4(RaisingWagesIsJustaStartonFixingSkilledWorkerVisas)65

单元测试题详解75

Unit3

文章与试题精析78

Text1(TheGuardianViewontheHumanities:theImportanceofBeingRounded)78

Text2(AirlinesBlameCovid-19forRowingBackClimateCommitments)87

Text3(HowGreenIsYourSoftware)97

Text4(AlgorithmsAreMakingEconomicInequalityWorse)106

单元测试题详解115

Unit4

文章与试题精析118

Text1(WhoBenefitsFromPublicGreenSpace)118

Text2(HowtoDe-corruptCollegeAdmissions)128

Text3(GenerousUnemploymentBenefitsAreNotKeepingAmericansFromWork)136

Text4(PerhapstheFDACouldHaveWaitedonVaping,ButItWasRighttoAct)146

单元测试题详解155

Unit5

文章与试题精析158

Text1(TheGuardianViewonLiterature:WeNeedtheNobelPrize)158

Text2(Facial-RecognitionTechnologyNeedsMoreRegulation)167

Text3(AsCarsDitchFossilFuels,HowCanGovernmentsTaxMotorists)176

Text4(TheMoonReallyMayHaveStrangeEffectsonOurHealth)184

单元测试题详解193

Unit6

文章与试题精析196

Text1(UberRidesCostMoreOK)196

Text2(WhenRankLeadstoRancour)204

Text3(PessimismVS.Progress)213

Text4(CommunicationIsKeytoConstructivePeerReview)224

单元测试题详解233

Unit7

文章与试题精析236

Text1(TheGuardianViewonEngland’sHungryChildren:TheIndigestibleTruth)236

Text2(FacebookShouldn’tHavetoPayPublishersforNews)245

Text3(VoteandBeHanged)254

Text4(WhyLondonHousePricesJumpedinNovember)263

单元测试题详解271

Unit8

文章与试题精析274

Text1(DNAIsNotaBlueprint)274

Text2(

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

　　　　Unit 1

　　　　Text 1(Shelter in Place)

　　　　Text 2(How to Make Artificial Intelligence More Democratic)

　　　　Text 3(The Guardian View on the Age of Criminal Responsibility: Raise It Now)

　　　　Text 4(Politicians Can’t Be Above the Law. Facebook’s Rules Are Another Story)

　　　　Text 1

　　　　Even in normal times, attending housing court in America is an upsetting encounter with the justice system, as few renters can afford lawyers to challenge the removal orders sought by their landlord. Even more discouraging would be the sight of a judge pronouncing a family’s removal by video conference during an epidemic.

　　　　Fortunately, many cities and states issued suspensions when it became clear that the epidemic would result in a lot of missed rent payments. The CARES Act, the enormous stimulus package passed by Congress, included a removal suspension for federally subsidised housing. Though it covered fewer than half of renters in the country, advocates cheered the measure before it expired. Congress has been unable to come up with a second stimulus bill, even though Democrats and Republicans agree that one is necessary, which prompted worries of a wave of removal filings. In some cities, removals quickly rose again after coming to a halt. The consequences looked bleak.

　　　　A solution has come from the Centres for Disease Control (CDC), which argued that removals accelerate the spread of the virus, and issued a sweeping suspension that applies to most renters nationwide. The public-health reason for the decision is straightforward. A team of epi-demiologists has published a model estimating that even a low removal rate (0.25% of households per month) would increase cases by 1.5% by the end of the year. But a high removal rate (2% of households per month) would increase cases by 13%.

　　　　Although the CDC order is doubtless well-intended, whether it will be judged legal is still uncertain. Without any immediate compensation for lost rental payments, landlords will be left with mounting bills. Arguably, this stands awkwardly with the constitutional guarantee that “private property shall not be taken for public use, without just compensation”. Indeed, there is already a lawsuit against the city and state removal suspensions introduced in Seattle on this ground.

　　　　Renter advocates and landlord-lobby associations agree on one thing—they would rather the federal government footed the bill. The stimulus proposal created by Democrats in Congress would set aside $100bn to help pay for six months of back-rent and late fees, but its actual passage looks improbable. Others would like to go further. Housing Justice for All, a New York group, would like all housing costs incurred during the epidemic to be “automatically forgiven and never owed”.

　　　　Nothing spurs policy innovation quite like a crisis. During the second world war America imposed extraordinary rent controls covering more than 80% of the national rental stock. Today, some would like to replace national rent control with national rent cancellation.

　　　　1. According to Paragraph 2, the removal suspension in the CARES Act

　　　　[A] expanded the coverage of housing subsidies.

　　　　[B] was heartily welcomed by quite a few people.

　　　　[C] complemented the previous stimulus bill.

　　　　[D] was backed by both political parties.

　　　　2. It can be learned from Paragraph 3 that a high removal rate

　　　　[A] follows the virus transmission.

　　　　[B] gains support from epidemiologists.

　　　　[C] puts pressure on transportation.

　　　　[D] leaves public health in danger.

　　　　3. The CDC order may be judged illegal because

　　　　[A] it fails to compensate for renters’ losses.

　　　　[B] it conflicts with a constitutional provision.

　　　　[C] it ignores the interests of landlords.

　　　　[D] it brings a growing number of lawsuits.

　　　　4. The agreement made by tenants and landlords

　　　　[A] called for the government to pay for the rental.

　　　　[B] pushed Congress to pass another stimulus bill.

　　　　[C] received favor from Housing Justice for All.

　　　　[D] canceled all housing costs during the crisis.

　　　　5. Rent controls during World War Ⅱ are mentioned to indicate that

　　　　[A] military operations affect rental stock of a country.

　　　　[B] the housing policy should benefit most Americans.

　　　　[C] a new policy is needed to substitute national rent control.

　　　　[D] the epidemic is likely to stimulate policy innovation.

　　　　Text 2

　　　　Deep learning, which has in recent years become the dominant technique for creating new AIs, uses enormous amounts of data and computing power to fuel complex, accurate models. These resources are more accessible for researchers at large companies and elite universities. A study from Western University suggests there has been a “de-democratization” in AI: the number of researchers able to contribute to cutting-edge developments is shrinking. This may contribute to some of the ethical challenges facing AI development, including privacy invasion, bias and the environmental impact of large models.

　　　　To combat these problems, researchers are trying to figure out how to do more with less. One such recent advance is called “less than one”-shot learning (LO-shot learning). The principle behind LO-shot learning is that it should be possible for an AI to learn about objects in the world without being fed an example of each one. This has been a major hurdle for contemporary AI systems, which often require thousands of examples to learn to distinguish objects. Humans, on the other hand, are often able to abstract away from existing examples in order to recognize new never-before-seen items.

　　　　Allowing AIs to learn with considerably less data is important for several reasons. First, by building in abstractions that capture the relationships between objects, this technique reduces the potential for bias. Currently, deep-learning systems fall prey to bias arising from irrelevant features in the data they use to train. A well-known example of this problem is that AI classifies dogs as wolves when shown images of dogs in a snowy environment—because most images of wolves feature them near snow. Being able to zero in on relevant aspects of the image would help prevent these mistakes. Reducing data needs thus makes these systems less liable to this sort of bias.

　　　　Next, the less extensive the data one needs to use, the less incentive exists to surveil people to build better algorithms. For example, soft distillation techniques have already impacted me-dical AI research, which trains its models using sensitive health information. In one recent paper, researchers used soft distillation in diagnostic x-ray imagery based on a small, privacy-preserving data set.

　　　　Finally, allowing AIs to learn with less plentiful data helps to democratize the field of artificial intelligence. With smaller AIs, academia can remain relevant and avoid the risk of professors being poached by industry. Not only does LO-shot learning make the barriers to entry lower by reducing training costs and lowering data requirements, but it also provides more flexibility for users to create novel data sets and experiment with new approaches. By reducing the time spent on data and architecture engineering, researchers looking to leverage AI can spend more time focusing on the practical problems they are aiming to solve.

　　　　6. According to Paragraph 1, “de-democratization” in AI may

　　　　[A] advance cutting-edge developments.

　　　　[B] intensify ethical issues in technology.

　　　　[C] increase the number of researchers.

　　　　[D] exert positive effects on environment.

　　　　7. “Less than one”-shot learning is designed to

　　　　[A] gather more feedback to improve today’s AI systems.

　　　　[B] show how the previous methods have been wrong.

　　　　[C] solve ethical challenges brought by de-democratization.

　　　　[D] figure out why humans excel at recognizing objects.

　　　　8. It seems that reducing the data used in AI could

　　　　[A] lower the possibility of underlying bias.

　　　　[B] free researchers from collecting data.

　　　　[C] explain why AI classifies dogs as wolves.

　　　　[D] grasp the relationships among objects.

　　　　9. It can be inferred f

在线阅读地址：2022考研英语 中公2022考研英语同源阅读精讲80篇在线阅读

在线听书地址：2022考研英语 中公2022考研英语同源阅读精讲80篇在线收听

在线购买地址：2022考研英语 中公2022考研英语同源阅读精讲80篇在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

《中公版·2022考研英语：同源阅读精讲80篇》是由中公教育研究生考试研究院在根据多年教学经验，并研究考研英语阅读历年真题规律的基础上编写而成的。本书的主要特色如下：

1.真题同源外刊精选80篇阅读 20单元测试题

本书内含20单元阅读练习题，共80篇文章，文章在来源、时间、题材及体裁上，均与真题保持一致；另外，在文章的难度、字数以及题目的命制等方面，也以真题为依据，遵循出题规律。每单元阅读练习后附单元测试题，帮助考生巩固单词、短语和长难句知识，并检测考生对文章的理解程度。这80篇文章可以作为历年真题以外的备考素材，供考生夯实语言基础并强化做题方法与技巧。

2.词句篇全方位多版块解读，逐题逐项深度解析

解析部分包含文章导读和段落及试题精析两大模块。文章导读部分从文章的题源、中英文题目和段落主旨等方面入手，帮助考生了解文章的行文思路，梳理文章脉络，理解文章主旨。段落及试题精析部分包括参考译文、逻辑梳理、背景知识、核心词汇及短语、长难句剖析和试题精析。其中，参考译文部分按照段落划分，提供中英对照的文章翻译，方便考生查看并理解原文及译文，准确理解文章内容。逻辑梳理部分梳理段落内句与句之间的逻辑关系，帮助考生培养逻辑思维，从微观上进一步理解文章的行文结构，协助解题。背景知识部分帮助考生了解国外经济、文化、教育，辅助做题。核心词汇及短语部分讲解重点词汇及短语，其释义包括“文章语境中的释义” “其他常见释义”，帮助考生背诵重点单词的常考意思，增加词汇储备量。长难句剖析部分采用直观的图示来分解原文语法结构，并加以文字说明，清晰且详细地分析长难句的主干及修饰成分，帮助考生克服长难句的理解障碍。试题精析部分不仅分析每道题正确选项的解题思路，还提供了干扰项的排除依据，锻炼考生解答题目的逻辑思维，从而帮助其掌握答题技巧，提高解题正确率。